
Energy and Environment News
June 24, 2015
Top Stories
Climate Change. A peer-reviewed study funded by the U.S. Department of Energy finds that oil extraction in Canada produces greenhouse-gas emissions that are 20% higher on average than those produced from conventional U.S. crude. The authors note that as oil-sands products become a larger fraction of the U.S. fuel mix over the next 15 years, the U.S. well-to-wheel emissions for gasoline and diesel production are likely to increase. WSJ
Climate Change. Eduardo Porter asserts in the NY Times that President Obama’s climate change strategy lacks strong analytical foundations and is driven more by hope than by science. He cites findings from various environmental experts — from top organizations like Greenpeace to economists at the University of Chicago — to demonstrate that policymakers’ preferred methods of combatting climate change are not supported by current data. NY Times
Energy Policy. Germany is forgoing plans to raise emissions charges for older coal-fired power stations at the request of its power sector, which warns that any levy would result in the closure of mines and plants, and potentially collapse the industry. The move illustrates the challenge Berlin faces as it attempts to meet its ambitious targets to combat climate change, while also safeguarding jobs. FT
Energy Outlook. Adie Tomer of the Brookings Institute explains that demand for gasoline in the U.S. is relatively inelastic, resulting in a close correlation between the retail price of gas and the amount of money that the average American family spends on gas relative to other household expenses. He argues that because gasoline prices are likely to increase over the longer term, the U.S. needs to find alternatives to driving in order to “dull” the economic impact of rising gas prices on other areas of the economy. Brookings